Prediction of Paul Chamberlin vs Huub Van Boeckel Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
P. Chamberlin vs H. Van Boeckel

Paul Chamberlin

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

5'10" (178 cm)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Huub Van Boeckel

NED

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

5'10" (178 cm)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Head-to-head: Chamberlin 1 - 0 Boeckel

They have played 3 sets in total, with Paul Chamberlin winning 2 and Huub Van Boeckel winning 1. The last match between Paul Chamberlin and Huub Van Boeckel was at the Jakarta CH, 02-11-1987, Round: SF, Surface: Hard, with Paul Chamberlin getting the victory 6-3 4-6 7-6.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Chamberlin	1
Boeckel	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(SF) Jakarta CH(11-02-87)

Stats

Paul Chamberlin

Huub Van Boeckel

P. Chamberlin vs H. V. Boeckel H2H Profile

P. Chamberlin	Stats	H. V. Boeckel
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
47.06% (80-90)	Career Total W/L	40.30% (54-80)
1	Hard	0
0	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

P. Chamberlin vs H. V. Boeckel Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paul Chamberlin has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Huub Van Boeckel has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paul Chamberlin, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Huub Van Boeckel has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Paul Chamberlin has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Huub Van Boeckel has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Paul Chamberlin has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Huub Van Boeckel winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Paul Chamberlin has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 59% (W/L 17/12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 2/4). Huub Van Boeckel has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 59% (W/L 9/13), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 36% (W/L 13/23).
Player level: In the last year, Paul Chamberlin has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Huub Van Boeckel has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Paul Chamberlin winning 1 times and Huub Van Boeckel being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Paul Chamberlin winning 2 and Huub Van Boeckel winning 1.
The last match between Paul Chamberlin and Huub Van Boeckel was at the Jakarta CH, 02-11-1987, Round: SF, Surface: Hard, with Paul Chamberlin getting the victory 6-3 4-6 7-6.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paul Chamberlin has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Huub Van Boeckel has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paul Chamberlin has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Huub Van Boeckel has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Paul Chamberlin has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Huub Van Boeckel has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Paul Chamberlin vs Huub Van Boeckel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

P. Chamberlin vs H. V. Boeckel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

P. Chamberlin	Stats	H. V. Boeckel
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
17	Games Won	15
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

P. Chamberlin Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
San Francisco - 04-02-1991
R1 David PateD. Pate	L	6-3 7-5	Stats
Tokyo - 08-10-1990
R1 Aki RahunenA. Rahunen	L	7-5 6-2	Stats
Sydney - 01-10-1990
R1 Sandon StolleS. Stolle	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Brisbane - 24-09-1990
R1 David EngelD. Engel	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
U.S. Open - 27-08-1990
R1 Rick LeachR. Leach	L	6-4 7-6 6-1	Stats

View All

H. V. Boeckel Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Valkenswaard CH - 14-11-1988
R4 Wally MasurW. Masur	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
R3 Hendrik Jan DavidsH. Jan	W	7-5 6-2	Stats
Hilversum - 25-07-1988
R3 Paul DoggerP. Dogger	L	6-7 6-3 6-2	Stats
Oporto CH - 11-07-1988
R3 Joao Cunha SilvaJ. Cunha	L	6-3 6-7 7-6	Stats
Wimbledon - 20-06-1988
R1 Patrik KuhnenP. Kuhnen	L	6-3 6-2 6-4	Stats

View All

P. Chamberlin vs H. V. Boeckel Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

P. Chamberlin	Stats	H. V. Boeckel
47.06% (80/90)	YTD Win/Loss	40.30% (54/80)
47.94% (198/215)	Sets Win/Loss	41.79% (140/195)
49.17% (1976/2043)	Games Win/Loss	47.25% (1535/1714)
50.00% (55/55)	Hard Win/Loss	36.11% (13/23)
33.33% (2/4)	Clay Win/Loss	39.34% (24/37)
24.00% (6/19)	Indoor Hard W/L	53.33% (8/7)
58.62% (17/12)	Grass Win/Loss	40.91% (9/13)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
297.65	Average Opponent Rank	480.78
55.56% (10/8)	Slam W/L	36.36% (4/7)
27.27% (3/8)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	25.00% (2/6)
46.32% (44/51)	Main Tour W/L	34.88% (15/28)
50.00% (23/23)	Challenger W/L	45.83% (33/39)
47% (70/148)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	42% (48/115)
48% (10/21)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	25% (4/16)
44% (19/43)	Deciding Set Win %	43% (21/49)
81% (85/69)	1st Set Won, Won Match	71% (55/39)
19% (85/16)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	27% (55/15)
13% (84/11)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	18% (78/14)